Our National Trade

Originally published in the Informanté newspaper on Thursday, 19 October, 2017.


No man is an island, they say, but this is perhaps even more true for countries. We do not stand alone from our neighbours. Over the last century, a web of trade has developed between countries, and it is largely responsible for the economic development we’ve seen globally since the mid twentieth century, due to the economic theory of comparative advantage. In short, it postulates that certain economic actors can produce certain goods or services at a lower opportunity cost than others. To maximize economic output, then, it makes sense to produce that which a certain country can produce at lower cost than anyone else and export it, and then import those goods which can be produced by other countries at a lower cost.

To maximize economic benefit, then, every nations imports some goods and services and exports others. These two do not always match, however, and this mismatch is called the balance of trade. The balance of trade is a large part of a country’s current account – which not only includes trade, but also capital flows in and out of an economy. Usually, countries produce a trade surplus during economic boom times, and then records a deficit during tougher times. 

Namibia, however, managed to record trade deficits ever since quarter 3 of 2012, peaking at a trade deficit per quarter of almost N$ 12 billion in the second quarter of 2015. Clearly when a country consistently imports more than it exports, it effectively exports locally created wealth abroad. It should therefore be of great concern to us when the Statistician General Alex Shimuafeni releases trade statistics via the Namibia Statistics Agency and reveals that over the last few years ( 10 quarters ) the Namibian trade deficit has grown by 49.9% Let’s take a look at the Quarterly Trade Statistics Bulletin for the second quarter of 2017, then. 


In the second quarter of this year, our trade deficit was N$ 6.2 billion, showing a deterioration of 26.8% from the first quarter.  This is the result of N$ 20.1 billion in imports, versus N$ 13.9 billion in exports, with the drop in exports since the first quarter the leading reason for this change. Over the last 5 years, the trade deficit averaged N$ 6.7 billion per quarter, mostly due to Namibia’s demand for high-valued manufactured commodities and machinery, while all we were exporting was primary goods. 

Let’s take a look at exports and imports individually. Namibia’s largest export market, as usual, is the Southern African Customs Union, with N$ 4.8 billion exported to that group of countries, or 38.1% of our exports. In second place is the European Union, with N$ 3.3 billion in exports (26.1%), then the European Free Trade Area (basically Norway, Iceland, Switzerland and Liechtenstein) with N$ 2 billion in exports (15.8%), followed by non-SACU SADC with N$ 1.1 billion (8.8%) in exports, and finally, the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) with N$ 984 million (7.2%) in exports.

When we take a look at the individual countries we export to, South Africa comes out top with N$ 3.1 billion exported to, or 22.7% of our exports, with Switzerland another N$ 2 billion (14.5%), Botswana at N$ 1.7 billion (10.1%), Spain with N$ 886 million (6.4%) and Belgium with N$ 758 million (5.4%). Together, these 5 account for 61.4% of our exports. Strangely, “Belgium” is the rudest word in the universe, which is "completely banned in all parts of the Galaxy, except in one part, where they could not possibly know what it means,” according to the Hitchhiker’s Guide of the Galaxy, but I digress. 

For Switzerland, we can see that 81.8% of our exports are copper ores and copper cathodes. This seems to be the result of the Louis-Dreyfus Group, based there, that via its subsidiary, Dundee Precious Metals, acquired the Tsumeb Smelter, and seems to be importing copper from Zambia to Namibia for smelting before re-exporting. The rest of our exports to Switzerland are, unsurprisingly, diamonds. Belgium (my apologies to sensitive intergalactic readers), mainly receives exports of Diamonds (59.8%) and Zinc (38.8%) from Namibia, while Spain is mainly a recipient of Namibian Fish, which amounted to N$ 778 million in this quarter, compared to N$ 993 million in the first quarter.

In terms of imports, the SACU is by far the largest source of imports, with N$ 13.6 billion imported, or 71% of our imports. The EU is second with N$ 2.1 billion (11.2%) imported, then the BRIC countries with N$ 1.4 billion (7.4%) imported, COMESA with N$ 1 billion imported (5.2%), and Non-SACU SADC at N$ 974 million (5.1%) imported. Taking a look at the individual countries we import from, South Africa stands at N$ 12.1 billion, accounting for 60.4% of our imports, with Botswana at N$ 1.3 billion (6.9%), Bulgaria at N$ 897 million (4.4%), Zambia at N$ 872 million (4.3%), and China at N$ 752 million (4.7%).

From South Africa, we source vehicles, boilers and most of our manufactured products as well as pharmaceuticals, as can be expected. This remains the main reason the Namibian dollar cannot delink from the Rand. Botswana’s imports are 94.5% diamonds – most likely re-imported after processing there. Bulgaria provided us with N$ 872 million worth of products from animal origin, while from Zambia we imported copper ore – for smelting, as mentioned above. China, of course, also provides vehicles and boilers and manufactured products, as can be expected, seeing as their products remain quite popular here in Namibia.

The data does not paint a pretty picture, does it? Namibia is still quite dependent on exporting raw materials to fund our economy, but our growing populace wants more manufactured products than we can afford, and so our wealth is exported to the world. We still do not have adequate capacity to process our own diamonds, given the diamond trade with Botswana. And we remain quite dependent on South Africa for our supply of manufactured goods. We need to start developing our own manufacturing industries, so we can export more to cover our imports. But I guess there’s one bright spot – at least our country is not called Belgium.

Another Quarterly Recession

Originally published in the Informanté newspaper on Thursday, 5 October, 2017.


It’s been 5 consecutive quarters now that Namibia has struggled in the grip of subnormal GDP growth. The figures released by the Namibia Statistics Agency a few weeks ago confirms that fact, but luckily shows some signs of abatement. Nevertheless, with the reveal that Namibia showed a contraction of 1.7% of GDP during the second quarter of the year, we still need to examine the data carefully. Let’s examine the report that Statistician-General Alex Shimuafeni released.  

To start off, let us examine the effect inflation has had on our country. After peaking at 6% during 2014, inflation consistently dropped on a year-to year basis until Quarter 2 of 2015, when it reached a low of 3%. Afterwards, it remained within the 3% to 3.5% range until the first quarter of 2016, when it shot up to 6%. Since then, it has climbed quarter to quarter, peaking in the first quarter of this year at 7.7%, before dropping by the second quarter to 6.3%. The good news is that inflation seems to be on a downward trend, having dropped to 5.4% by August already.

So let’s take a look at the different economic sectors before taking an overall view. The Agriculture and Forestry sector is a highlight for this quarter, as it managed strong growth of 17%. This is as a result of good rainfall, which saw an increase in crop farming (and in cereal production specifically) and resulted in the crop farming subsector posting 32% growth. Livestock farming also didn’t disappoint, with growth of 12.5%, while abattoirs and butchers recorded a turnaround, showing growth of 3.9% after having posted declines in the previous quarter.  The Fishing sector, however, did not do as well, recording a contraction of 9.8%, down from growth of 4.6% during the first quarter. 

Mining and Quarrying, fortunately, showed strong growth of 25.8% during the quarter, with all subsectors showing growth. In particular, the diamond subsector grew by 33.2%, due to an increase in carats produced, while the metal ore subsector grew by 20.8% off the back of zinc production that spiked to 38.1%. The uranium subsector is still struggling, off the back of weak demand and low market prices, but for a change the subsector didn’t contract. Rather, it posted strong growth of 14.2% due to increased production as a result of the new mine that came online during the quarter. The other subsectors also registered strong growth of 31% due to marble production that increased by 75%

The Manufacturing sector also showed signs of a turnaround, with growth of 2.9% compared to a contraction of 10.7% in the first quarter. This was as a result of superior performance in several subsectors, with diamond cutting and polishing up by 37%, beverages up by 10.8% and fish processing growing by 8.5%. Unfortunately, not all subsectors did well, with chemical manufacturing and products declining by 16.2% and non-metallic mineral products down by 4.1%. The Electricity and Water sector also started to feel the effect of muted economic growth, with electricity down by 0.5% and water down by 4.2%. The sector’s overall contraction of 1.1% is due to a decrease in volumes sold to distributors, most likely as a result of usage growth slowing in line with economic growth. 

The Construction sector continues its slide downwards, now in its sixth consecutive quarter of contraction. This sector has been reduced to about 30% of its size as it was at the start of 2015, and half the size it was at the end of 2016. It’s contraction of 44.9% recorded in the first quarter has been followed with a contraction of 51.9% during this quarter, mostly as a result of government construction reducing by 83.3%. There does appear to be at least some signs of stabilization, with the value of buildings completed increasing by two-thirds from first quarter figures.

Wholesale and retail trade continues to feel the effects of the prolonged recession as it records its third consecutive quarter of decline, contracting by 8.2%. The supermarket subsector went from a small positive growth of 0.6% in the first quarter to a contraction of 0.7% this quarter, with furniture sales similarly swinging from 4.2% positive growth to an 11.6% decline. The contraction in vehicle sales increased its contraction of 16.6% in the first quarter to 24.6% this quarter. Hotels and Restaurants, however, reduced its contraction to only 3% in this quarter from 9.3% in the first quarter. 

The Transport and Communication sector showed some recovery, growing by 3.5% this quarter, with port services contracting by only 7.6% compared to 23.6% in the previous quarter, while railway transport posted positive growth of 3.4%. The Financial Intermediation sector continued to show slow growth, with only 0.9% recorded this quarter, with the banking subsector contributing 1% growth and the insurance subsector contributing 0.8%. Finally, the Public Administration, Defence, Education and Health sector still shows a decline of 2.3% due to government consolidation. The Education subsector showed growth of 1.4%, while the Health subsector grew by 0.3%. 



It is clear from the data that we’re still struggling, but there seems to be a silver lining around our dark clouds that imply that with a bit of wind, the sun can shine again on our economy. We’ve got several sectors performing admirably, with a few stragglers showing signs of a turnaround, and others that are only struggling as a result of our substandard growth, and should recover once growth returns. With a bit of hope, and a bit of luck, our economy is on the verge of lifting itself out of this recession, and it will only require our patience and support to do so. Namibia has not let us down yet – let’s not let it down either.

The Grand Finale of Cassini

Originally published in the Informanté newspaper on Thursday, 21 September, 2017.


On Friday, 15 September 2017, at 11:55:46 UTC, the Grand Finale ended. The spacecraft Cassini entered and crashed into the atmosphere of the gas giant Saturn, and signal was lost. This was the final of 22 orbits, its ‘Grand Finale,’ as it entered the atmosphere about 10 degrees north of Saturn’s equator at a speed of over 120 000 km/h. For 13 years, Cassini has been sending back its remarkable readings and photographs of Saturn and its moons, and now its mission was finally over. 

So what has happened over the last 4 months during Cassini’s Grand Finale? In the first orbit, the Visible and Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) as well as the Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS) produced a movie of Saturn’s north polar region, including the planet’s hexagon jet stream for a full rotation of the planet. The second orbit provided the opportunity for the magnetometer to make high-intensity magnetic field observations of the planet for the first time ever. The Imaging Science Subsystem (ISS) simultaneously observed its rings while the sun was hidden, allowing the observations of faint ringlets. 

The third orbit provided the opportunity to use the Radio Science Subsystem (RSS) to perform gravity field measurements to study the interior of Saturn. The fourth has the ISS observe the most prominent ring propellers, while the RSS ran a gravity experiment to study the planet’s gravitational field. The Cosmic Dust Analyser (CDA) scooped up ring particles to determine their age. The fifth orbit continued the RSS and CDA experiments, while the ISS and CIRS observed and mapped the planet’s atmosphere. 

The sixth obit had the ISS takes pictures of Saturn’s rings, while the RADAR mapped the rings down to 100 meters per pixel. During the seventh orbit, the CIRS made high-resolution thermal scans of the rings while the RADAR continued its experiment. During the eight orbit, Saturn’s southern hemisphere was mapped. In the ninth orbit, the Ultraviolet Imaging Spectrograph (UVIS) observes Saturn’s northern aurora, while the Ion and Neutral Mass Spectrometer (INMS) measures the density and composition of particles in the ring plane. 

During the tenth orbit, the CIRS observes Saturn’s A ring to compare its ice with those of its moons. During the eleventh orbit, the UVIS studies the edge of the atmosphere – airglow, auroras and hydrocarbons – while the CIRS maps the temperature of the north polar vortex and the VIMS captures a movie of the southern polar vortex. In the twelfth orbit, the UVIS studies small scale structures in the rings, and in the thirteenth orbit, the CIRS observes the A ring to determine its composition and structure, while the ISS makes a high-resolution scan of the B and C rings. By now, Cassini is within 50 000 km of the atmosphere, and the INMS samples the planet’s exosphere and ionosphere. 

On the fourteenth orbit, the RSS performs its last observations as Cassini skims the atmosphere, while feeling the gravitational pull of the rings, determining their mass very accurately, while the VIMS observes Saturn’s southern hemisphere at night. In the fifteenth orbit, the UVIS observes the auroral zones on both poles, while the Radio and Plasma Wave Science (RPWS) captures ‘whistlers’ produced by the planet’s lightning. During the sixteenth orbits, both the UVIS and VIMS focus to produce high-resolution auroral images. 

The seventeenth orbit sees the ISS targeting Saturn’s ring propeller features, and marks the start of the end for Cassini. Only five orbits remain – the final five that are low enough to start passing through the atmosphere. During the eighteenth orbit, the CIRS observes the atmosphere’s edge to determine temperatures at different altitudes. The ISS observes the mysterious streaks in the C ring, while the INMS performs the first ever direct sampling of Saturn’s atmosphere. 

Less than a month is now left for Cassini. In the nineteenth orbit, CIRS observes temperatures in Saturn’s southern pole, while the VIMS stares at the southern auroras to produce a mosaic. During the twentieth orbit, the CIRS maps the northern hemisphere to study temperatures in the troposphere, while the VIMS maps the equatorial regions. The RADAR studies the atmosphere in active mode, while the INMS performs a second direct sampling of the upper atmosphere. In the twenty-first orbit, both the VIMS and the CIRS work together to study Saturn’s atmosphere, while the INMS made its third direct sampling as well. 

During the final, twenty-second orbit, the CIRS and VIMS together focused to determine the amount of helium in the atmosphere, while the INMS performs its fourth direct sampling from the atmosphere. The RADAR was focused on studying the ammonia in the atmosphere, while the ISS captured an iconic image of the rings as seen looking outward from Saturn. And so, the Cassini-Huygens missions that started on 15 October 1997 came to a close.


On 12 September, 2017, at 5h27 UTC, Cassini’s final plunge began. During its final days, data from the CIRS and UVIS were transmitted to Earth in real-time, seconds after each observation. By 15 September, 2017, at 10h31, thrusters were activated to maintain altitude control for its final minute. Thereafter, Cassini started to tumble into Saturn’s atmosphere, unable to maintain radio contact with Earth. Its final signals were received, after the 84 minute lightspeed delay of radio signals, at 11h55:46 by NASA’s Deep Space Network.

The total cost of the missions was a mere US$ 3.9 billion over the 20 years, costing about US$11 per American, US$1 per European and US$ 3 per Italian, the mission’s three main sponsors. A small price to pay for the wealth of information brought back. Cassini programme manager Earl Maize described the probe as a ‘superb machine’ that ‘to the very end did everything we asked.’ He continued, ‘Cassini has ended its mission high over the clouds of Saturn. Thanks and farewell, faithful explorer.’